Homosexuality

Question: Homosexuality ? I request you all to comment on the following idea. Everyone born on this world as homosexuals. Because they know about their body parts very well than the opposite sex and they know which parts are pleasurable ones. When reaching teen age they come to know that positive is attracted by negative. And the curiosity leads them to watch the adult videos. They understand that sex with the opposite sex is important to give birth to a child. And due to the social responsibilities they shape themselves as a straight guy or girl. And they become straight. Those who always question the traditional things give impedence to the change in the sexual behaviour. After this some act like they are straight and some declare themselves as homosexuals. How many of you agree to this theory? If you don't agree with this please provide explaination. Thankyou very much for your valuable time.

Answer: Ridiculous, sorry to be forward. Sex and sexuality are such basic human functions that thought, socitey or influnce have very lttle to do with its formation. Mannerisms and sexulity also have very little to do with each other. Serving in the military , I knew gay guys that were more masc. and played better football than any hetero. Children and people in America(YES, America, because no were else in the worls are gays soo fem.) are placed in boxes and lables so others can understand them. They grew into these molds and often their sexuality becomes their personality. This is what is seen as the norm., because it's so obvious to locate,because they are different and standout. To answer your question though, it is IMPOSSIBLE for a person to change their sexuality. it is very possible to lie and pretend, have children etc., but we all know how the story ends. Daddy has a bf, and mom is asking for a divorce. Nature loves variation, but for some reason our society hates it. P.S.- I hope that one of those damn fools that think you can pray away gay, or therapy it away reads this and gets a clue:)

Question: What is the research regarding homosexuality besides the research about it being hereditary? I've heard a lot f speculation about this topic like the stuff about homosexuality being something that your born with. I would like to know more about other scenarios that have nothing to do with a person being "born" with the gene such as any studies about homosexuality and traumatic events or spending lots of time with your own gender. Websites, examples and specific research would be very helpful! Thanks.

Answer: Who cares, if you like girls you like girls, if you like guys you like guys, why do we need to analyze it with science?

Question: How is homosexuality different from any other sexual pervertedness? Yes I have heard the argument that Gays do not choose to be Gay. However, does just because they dont choose to be Gay, does that make homosexuality alright? What about the pedophille? Does that person choose to be attracted to children? Or the person who has fantasies about BDSM/rape? Or beastiality? Is it their fault that they get pleasure from that? What difference does it make if someone chooses to be these things or not?

Answer: a very good question.let gay and their supporters answer the question.peole find excuses for their mistake .that does not meant that we all have to accept it

Question: What is the mathematical probability of homosexuality in men and women in india? There's a great fuss about terrorism and homosexuality in india in the recent past. Mathematical probability of terror attack in india in 1 year is 64/365. So i wanna know what the stats suggest about homosexuality?

Answer: ya ask your grandpa to build a time machine. maybe he can tell... or scratch your head it may be equal to the number of dandruff flakes that come out of there.

Question: What form of homosexuality is banned in chrisitianity? I have been having several debates on this. In my opinion, christinaity doesn't condemn homosexuality in totality. It's man to man homosexuality that's condemned. There's nothing wrong with women to women homosexuality. Please tell me if I am right?

Answer: They'll condemn both men and women for it - they're equal opportunities bigots.

Question: What evidence is there that homosexuality is a sin? I have been doing research, and, seriously, why do people think homosexuality is a sin? We just love differently than heterosexuals. What right do people have to hurt or kill homosexuals in the name of God? God wants us to love one another, not judge and kill each other! Ok, first, it is not a mental illness. No where in any psychology book says that being GLBT is an illness. Second, did you know that the Catholic Church originally stated in their Catechism that being gay wasn't a choice and no one should abuse a homosexual. Unfortunately, they quickly changed their wording to make it seem like it was a choice.

Answer: Thank you so much for asking this question!!! I drives me crazy that people think Christians are just being ignorant and narrow minded. Okay, it's a sin because God says it's wrong. Much like lying is a sin cause God says it's wrong. You are right, God also says to love. And you can love the sinner and hate the sin. (Much like I love myself but I hate the stupid things I do.) Here are some Bible references for your consideration: "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable." (Leviticus 18:22) "For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him." (John 3:17) "That is why God abandoned them to their shameful desires. Even the women turned against the natural way to have sex and instead indulged in sex with each other. And the men, instead of having normal sexual relations with women, burned with lust for each other. Men did shameful things with other men, and as a result of this sin, they suffered within themselves the penalty they deserved." (Romans 1:26-27) "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders." (1 Corinthians 6:9) "Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion." (Romans 1:24-27) "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God." (1 Corinthians 6:9-11) Does this explain? Please email me with any questions. And please understand I don't hate gays. My best friend is lesbian. We understand one another and we happily co-exist.

Question: What did St. Paul teach about homosexuality and women which may be considered unacceptable in today's society? Many people have singled out St. Paul (a former pharisaic jew who had a conversion experience on the road to Damascus) for being a man of his time and that some of his writings on acts of homosexuality and the role of women may not be considered appropriate for the modern world, almost 2,000 years after St. Paul's death. Reference to his texts (13 letters to the early churches) would help.

Answer: This opinionated man managed to get most of his ideas validated by early church exploiters. As far as I can see, it had little to do with the life and death of Jesus, who paul didn't even know.

Question: Is there an inverse correlation between homosexuality and religion? In other words, in societies where religion is more dominant, is there less homosexuality?

Answer: Oh no. I think you'd be surprised to find instead that areas where religion is more dominant, the gays are more flamboyant. Except in Muslim countries where there's a death penalty for homosexuality or in places like Philippines where honor killings of gays within the family are prevalent and even praised. However, gays still are just as likely to exist in such places, just driven underground. In my own Latino culture, gays are met with much religious hatred and violence yet Latino gays are the most loudest and fruitiest of the bunch. And gay Latinos make up the highest percentage of gays in the US, yet Latinos are notorious for being the most religious ethnic group as well. Just goes to show you that religion does not stop people from being gay. If it's a religion that particularly violent against gays, it just creates more closet cases nothing more.

Question: If you think that homosexuality is a choice, then how do you explain it in other animals like doplphins? This question is directed to religious people who think that homosexuality is a choice. Most of you believe that only humans have souls and logical thought, so why do other animals have cases of homosexuality too? Are they choosing between being heterosexual and homosexual like us humans?

Answer: By and large they claim that it is either purely for pleasure or dominance humping, despite evidence to the contrary. When you bring up evidence to the contrary (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15750604/) they usually say something fallacious such as: Humans aren't animals! (which we are) or Moral laws don't apply to animals! (morality is relative and cooperation within species [basic morality] is frequently observed in nature) or Animals eat their young too, should we? (because apparently they lack the capacity to differentiate between something that is victimless and something that results in a death)

Question: Why is homosexuality treated so profoundly as a separate sexual preference beyond all others? Homosexuality is just a sexual preference and attraction. I'm not saying it's a conscious choice anymore than being straight is. But all it is is a sexual preference, no different than say a foot fetish, people don't decide to have these, they just find certain things attractive for subconscious reasons and there is nothing wong with that, but why is an attraction to a person of the same sex treated as being more powerful and profound, I think it's just further regressing the lack of sexual understanding in society.

Answer: As a straight girl, the closest I can come to explaining what I think is that it's the type of person people are into. I fancy non-pretty (read masculine) guys who are kind of scruffy. Some people are attracted to pretty boys, some people are into people who share their gender. I didn't chose to be into rugged men, they didn't chose to be homosexual. Some people think it is a choice because they honestly believe that people would choose to be controversial just to be difficult and complicate their own lives because they are "sinners". That argument doesn't make sense to me.